It's my personal opinion that you should never assume anything with VAT. Many of you are probably thinking now of the Jaffa Cakes case which was about whether it was a cake or a biscuit? ...
In 1988, the statutory definition of confectionery (which is subject to VAT) was changed to include items of sweetened prepared food normally eaten with the fingers. HMRC undertook a review and reversed its viewpoint ruling that Jaffa Cakes were actually biscuits partly covered in chocolate and so subject to VAT. In 1991 McVitie's appealed and headed off to a VAT tribunal.
The tribunal assessed the following:
- The product's name
- The ingredients
- The product's texture
- The texture of the product when it goes stale
- The structure of the product
- The size of the product
- How the product is sold in shops
- How the product is marketed
The court found in favour of McVitie's and stated that, legally, Jaffa Cakes are considered a cake, which means that McVitie's doesn't have to pay VAT on Jaffa Cakes in the UK.
This all happened back in the early nineties, but 30 years on we have the issue with other confectionery bars. In accordance with the 1988 statutory definition of confectionery, cereal bars held together with syrup are subject to VAT.
However, Wm Morrison Supermarkets have recently argued that this definition does not apply to Nakd Wholefood bars whose main ingredient, dates, was already sweet and not sweetened by other ingredients or natural flavourings.
The tax tribunal decided that the cereal bars were still confectionery, the ingredients had been processed, packaged as a treat snack and finally marketed as treats!
So, I'll leave you until next time pondering how VAT can be so tricky, and with the other thought, can a pineapple flavoured Jaffa cake still be called a Jaffa cake? I thought a Jaffa was an orange.
If you feel inspired to find out more about anything I've said here, do call me on 01908 774320 or leave a comment below and I'll be in touch as soon as I can.